Rocky Mountain Labs FEDERAL VIOLATION

NIH does not care for the public they are sworn to serve,
or their mission:

Sound ISSUE:

NEPA VIOLATION



The Rocky Mountain Labs in Hamilton, MT did not own the property at 801 S. 4th St. in 2009 when the Final EIS or FEIS was published.

To destruct a property is considered a major project, and without an FEIS or EIS or EA of any kind that is current is a violation of Federal NEPA law 42 USCA 4332 et. seq.; 40 CFR 1502-1508 et. seq.

When the US Government violates federal law, who stops them?

Below is the solicitation from the Indian Health Service Seattle for the unlawful work:

Solicitation Number:

12-102-SOL-00003

Notice Type:

Presolicitation

Synopsis:

Added: Apr 06, 2012 5:52 pm

PURSUANT TO FAR 19.804-2 ELIGIBILITY FOR THIS SOLICITATION IS LIMITED TO 8(a) FIRMS IN THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION's REGION VIII (8-Denver - Montana, North & South Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado and Utah) FOR CONSTRUCTION FIRMS WITH A BONA FIDE PLACE OF BUSINESS WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHICAL COMPETITIVE AREA AND THE ASSIGNED NAICS.
The Indian Health Service, Division of Engineering Services, Seattle is the administrator of this solicitation for the National Institute of Health's Rocky Mountain Lab.

This site improvement project for the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) Rocky Mountain Laboratories (RML) campus is located in Hamilton, MT. The RML campus has undergone extensive construction projects over the past several years and this project represents the main completion of the overall work. It includes the construction of roads, parking, landscaping, site lighting, security measures, and associated systems. RML is a research campus consisting of approximately 35 acres and 30 buildings. The improvement features in this project will be completed on an occupied, operating campus that will require significant coordination and work sequencing to keep existing functions active with minimal disturbance while completing the work. The Government will prescribe a work sequencing schedule for designated areas and sub-areas encompassing the project as a whole in the solicitation.

The project includes demolition of existing features including a building with asbestos containing material and lead based paint, asphalt, concrete, chain link fence, trees and shrubs. This project will involve extensive grading and dirt work, including stripping and grubbing, placing, compacting, and grading of base materials and final surfaces. There will be approximately 2.75 acres of asphalt paving in roads and parking areas, approximately 80,000 square feet (sf) of concrete sidewalks of various thicknesses and widths, and approximately 14,000 linear feet (lf) of curb and gutter. There will be extensive storm water management features including swales and approximately 40 drywells. The project involves drilling a new well or wells and abandonment of several existing wells. There will be abandonment, repair, and installation of utilities including steam and condensate lines, other piping and water and sewer mains and appurtenances. New site lighting with associated underground power and control systems will be installed as well as other conduit, power and control systems. Security features will be installed such as approximately 1,320 lf of nine-foot tall steel perimeter fence, power gates, hydraulic pop-up ram barriers, large boulders, barriers, etc.

The project also includes approximately 15 acres of landscaping including imported soil, sod grass, dry land native grass, bedded areas, trees, shrubs, and mulching. A new comprehensive, centrally controlled irrigation system will be installed as part of this project. Site amenities included in this project include cover bike racks, motorcycle shelters, picnic tables, benches and trash cans.

The estimated construction price range is $5,000,000 to $10,000,000.

The contract completion date, with an estimated start work date of on or about August 31, 2012 is October 31, 2014.

This is a Best Value procurement process and the basis for award is the tradeoff process.

The estimated issue date of the solicitation on FBO is on or about April 25, 2012 with an approximate proposal due date of June 11, 2012. Exact due date regardless will be in the solicitation and may be subject to change only through amendments.

An organized site visit and pre-proposal meeting is planned for May 16, 2012 - 1:00pm local time - at the Rocky Mountain Lab Campus in Hamilton, MT. Further specifics for attending this meeting will be posted on this site and in Section L of the Solicitation.

This solicitation will be available by download from the Internet only. The project specification-plans files are Portable Document Format (PDF) files and can be viewed, navigated, or printed using Adobe Acrobat Reader. In order to download the files for this project, registration at the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website http://www.fbo.gov is required. Downloads are available only through the FedBizOpps website. This announcement serves as the advance notice for this project. AMENDMENTS WILL BE AVAILABLE FROM THE ABOVE WEBSITE BY DOWNLOAD ONLY. Further details will be issued with the solicitation.

Contracting Office Address:

2201 6th Avenue
Mail Stop RX-24,
Seattle, Washington 98121

Place of Performance:

904 South 4th Street
Hamilton, Montana 59840
United States

Primary Point of Contact.:

William Standley,

Contract Specialist

william.standley@ihs.gov

Phone: 2063747302

Fax: 2066152466

Secondary Point of Contact:

Paul J. Reed,

Chief of Contracting Office

paul.reed@ihs.gov

Phone: (206)615-2504

Fax: (206)615-2466

More problems at the RML campus of NIH NIAID Hamilton MT

Discrimination at First Security Bank (FSB)

Ms. Sue Brown                                                                   January 8, 2013

Human Resources First Security Bank

Missoula, MT 59801

CC: Sheryl Fisher, HR

RE: Discriminatory practices at Hamilton FSB branch.

UPDATE: The First Security Bank lied to the Montana Banking Commission about mistreatment, saying like a Bar, they have the right to refuse anyone.  FAIR PLAY: consumers looking for bank accounts should stay away from First Security Bank (FSB) get on that horse symbol of theirs and ride well away from this bank.

 

"We reserve the right to refuse service if we make ignorant judgments of prospective customers....therefore please bank elsewhere."--The Management



 

www.trademarkia.com

Dear Ms. Brown,

I had left a message in HR yesterday morning about being denied access to a business account, and apparently this is so important to First Security Bank (FSB) that no contact was made by the bank.  I tried again today, and again even the customer service employees at FSB could not reach their own in-house Human Resources Department.

The Human resources available at the Hamilton, MT branch are those bank officers at FSB willing to make judgments about prospective customers.  I am taking the time to write this because I am sure FSB will continue to employ officers of this bank who wholeheartedly decide who should have an account with First Security Bank (FSB).

My prior business account was destroyed by these same officials who are employed by FSB in Hamilton in 2009.  I paid more than $200 in fees for the Hamilton FSB error, something these apparently ignorant people felt would not be rectified by me three years ago.

I acquired the opportunity to work in Asia but needed a business account to successfully complete a project.  Since I paid the FSB fees, and a period of three years had passed, my understanding was I could open a new account with First Security Bank in Hamilton, MT. 

As I waited for all other customers to be serviced, or gossiped with by your accounts representative named Maggie, I was approached by Vice President Allen Hill of First Security Bank.  I was informed I was a “charge-off” customer and the bank could not open an account.  No computers were consulted, no phone calls made by any FSB official, including the Bank President Robert Whalen.  The accounts representatives in Missoula told me very cavalierly that the computers in both banks obtain the same information; meaning the Hamilton FSB employees could have easily found out their judgment was false.

Last time I checked, I am not black, I don’t have leopard spots on my skin, and I was dressed professionally on the day in question in June of 2012.  I also fully understand that women probably don’t have the same standing, and FSB will not take this seriously even though discrimination is a very bad idea at a bank who obtains FDIC insurance: read federal oversight.

Does FSB train its employees in its policies, or do employees and officers of FSB just judge people who come into its doors so to give FSB money via exuberant fees from their “free accounts”?  While I freely admit, I told Mr. Hill I would Blog on this matter I have.  More than 100 people have read and told friends about your bank practices at First Security Bank.

To be Honest, I have more faith in the general population than I have in FSB, or even the Montana Bank Commission.  I was just wondering what a Human Resources person felt about the “resources” of FSB acting in such an appalling manner?   I have faced several instances from FSB; what I would call unprofessional behavior.  Your CEO’s in the Flathead are no better---they let this kind of behavior slide at FSB.

I had asked Mr. Hill to get someone on the phone, and explained that I had paid the (exuberant) fees.  A slight bit of shock crossed his face as he repeated my speech that I paid the fees.  Fees that FSB Hamilton stole from me, for that branch’s error.  As the computers in Hamilton, and Missoula tell the same tale, this leaves the employees and officers in Hamilton who violated FSB bank Policy and Federal law.  Why doesn’t FSB just do nothing as the public is aware?

How does a bank such as First Security Bank (FSB) acquire such human talent?  Where does this bank find such judgmental employees?  How does one company, First Security Bank have such disparity between offices?  How is such a travesty allowed by a corporation such as Glacier Bancorp?  Perhaps all outsiders who are not white old people known to these bank officers be treated with such disdain?  How is Montana to increase its job force when a business is treated with such judgment?a

Read more about how First Security Bank sucks in Montana:
http://wethepeoplemt.blogspot.com/2012/06/first-security-bank-sucks.html

I don’t think Scott your bank CEO gives a crap, as long as he can afford a steak at the Montana Club, and play links in the climate weather.  Perhaps Allen Hill will get a raise, and Maggie will continue to screw up royally as long as incompetent staff are above her.  Remember all FSB branches represent the company, including Hamilton, MT.

So the real statement to be made here is that FSB embraces discriminatory behavior of its employees.  The buck stops with its human resources, that would be you.  As the disgusting, and non-lawful actions continue at your bank, the unknown supply of consumers will demand better service at a better rival bank, and hopefully will move their funds after hearing this account.

I am currently a proud credit union customer, and holder of two (2) business accounts at competitor banks.  Never have I been treated as I have at FSB as described in 8-10 US States or several foreign countries.  Please secure your bank with more professional employees.

Keep up the tremendous work, and don’t forget I documented the non-contact by FSB HR Dept.

 Sincerely,

Michael Spreadbury

_______________________________________________________________________

First Security Bank FSB based in Missoula would rather give false statements to the banking commission in Helena than look at hard facts that they discriminate, their employees do not follow policy but the Montana Banking commission feel discrimination is called for.

"Its nothing new" said the Montana Banking Commission when provided evidence of being treated differently by FSB officials in Hamilton, MT.  "Hire a lawyer" even though banking practices are in their mission statement in Montana.

Funny, I thought we pay for a banking commission in Montana to ensure sound banking practices.  Apparently not in the case of First Security Bank (FSB).

First Security Bank would rather blame their customers, than treat them with respect.

First Security Bank in Montana would rather judge you than serve you.

First Security bank presidents would rather lie than deal with their own employees.

Fisrt Security Bank lost many customers when Citizens State Bank was bought out.

First Security Bank would rather blame customers for their own problems than deal with them well.

When did our society allow a bank like First Security Bank never be wrong? 
When did First Security Bank think abusing its customers could be covered with published defamation.

First Security Bank is the Worst Bank that I have ever dealt with.  Perhaps First Security Bank never heard the phrase "the customer is always right".  The new phrase is First Security Bank is always right.

My assumption about First Security Bank was correct, Scott Burke does not give a crap about customer mistreatment, he is a small minded stupid individual just like his employees in Hamilton.  Mr Scott Burke is stupid because he wrote defamation and false statements to the Montana Banking Commission.

The truth, as it happened is a threat to First Security Bank because its mangement or officers of the Hamilton branch did treat a member of the public differently, due to their own judgment which was entirely FALSE.

First Security Bank loves to charge excessive fees for their "Free Checking" and dont know how to handle it when someone actually pays the false charges.  Please know if you are a business customer, that First Security Bank will judge you (most likely falsely) and be completely ignorant to their own policies at First Security Bank.

Unless you want to give your money away, do not start an account, and close your account with First Security Bank.

Terror risk HIGH at RML

The Rocky Mountain Labs in Hamilton MT is currently working on a virus that originated from a Muslim pilgrimage.  What a national institutes of health (NIH) lab is doing with that disease only proves that US Agencies only do what they are told by US Presidents since 2004 here.

Dangerous Accident at RML reported to the Centers for Disease Control

from use of laboratory equipment that High School students wouldnt do.



The other thing it tells us is that a NIH lab cannot be designed for the safety of Americans.  No bio-hazmat within 50 miles, no sound buffer for Low Frequency Noise (LFN), but its in a remote setting where only less than 100,000 Americans will die if there is a problem.

The Associated Press (AP) is attempting to cover up this letter which was written in response to the Virology director at RML saying the facility was built to handle the most dangerous viruses.

Here is the letter that was covered up (or attempted so) by the NIH about their lab in Hamilton MT.

Webmaster note: the website for this newspaper, in business for nearly 25 years was destroyed shortly after this opinion letter was written.  Site was hacked: www.Bitterrrootstar.com

Virus under Study at Rocky Mountain Lab

It was intriguing to read the December 19, 2012 edition of the Bitterroot Star Weekly as Carlotta Grandstaff wrote an article for the Rocky Mountain labs and their work on a new virus.  In the past, I had quoted her work from the Missoula Independent with regards to Geoff Mahar orchestrating felonies to obtain fraudulent convictions, but Ravalli County never does anything like that.

The Rocky Mountain labs have been in Hamilton, MT for about 100 years, information Ms. Grandstaff neglected to report.  As Mark Twain once said “Get the facts first, then distort them as you please.”  Dr. Heinz Feldman, Chief of the Virology Laboratory at RML mentioned how the facility in Hamilton is built for examining dangerous viruses that have potential for public health damage.   The Rocky Mountain Lab was designed by Marshall Bloom with a disregard for the public’s health in Hamilton MT.  After three years of operation, RML can’t even provide employee parking without purchasing, and grading residential property north of federal property.

The RML lab is credited for a cure to the still under-diagnosed Lyme Disease, and dug a moat around the RML facility to convince local residents that ticks couldn’t swim.  Lyme Connecticut (named for this tick-borne disease) is across the Sound from Long Island NY where NIH had a facility at Fire Island.  Today no moats are needed, every official at NIH feel Rocky Mountain Laboratories is safe including Bloom, Feldman, the Director, and officials in the Office of Facility Services for NIH.

RML is the only bio-level 4 laboratory (of 4) without fire protection adjacent, or on the facility.  The Hamilton Volunteer Fire Department (HVFD) is no match to Bethesda, MD fire department, or the revamped fire department on the Bethesda NIH campus.  The Raleigh-Durham Fire Department has more resources and capability, as do the Frederick, MD Fire Department than HVFD.  On September 12, 2011 the only communication network operational in Hamilton was two way radio, as a fiber-optic telephone cable was severed.  NIH was not prepared or protected by the Ravalli County 911 center or otherwise as no Bio-Hazmat capabilities are within 50 miles.

RML, which claims to be prepared for any virus, emits sound from its cooling and exhaust fans with a frequency in the low range which penetrates homes, causes depression, heart problems and awakens residents (sleep deprivation) who pay federal taxes for the NIH lab.  Rocky Mountain Labs published a newsletter to the community May 31, 2011 that stated the noise coming from the new $66M lab in Hamilton was less than before the lab was built!  We were not born yesterday NIH.  RML’s sound contractor was sanctioned with a cease and desist letter by the State of Montana for practicing engineering without a license in Hamilton, MT for NIH.

While Dr. Feldman and Marshall Bloom may feel Rocky Mountain Labs is ready to examine viruses that have public health hazards, perhaps these NIH officials might want to start with their agency goals of accountability to the public and scientific integrity.  As homes are within 10 feet of noise sources, standard buffers dictate a 1500 ft. protection zone.  As the constant noise of RML affects our neighborhood, it is far different than attempting to fool us with a moat, or a newspaper article saying RML is built to handle dangerous viruses.

Source of letter:
http://www.bitterrootstar.com/2013/01/02/about-that-virus-research-at-rocky-mountain-lab/

UPDATE: The Rocky Mountain Lab in Montana, which works with infectious agents (without cure) and virology agents, are most likely gene-typing the Muslim medical susceptibility to disease.  If there is any target more sensitive, I am not aware.  The Muslim community needs to take heed: the Americans are learning how to kill you in this Bio-4 facility in Hamilton MT....this is my protected opinion after seeing the disregard for health, safety, and White House activity at this secure top security clearance US "critical" facility.

 

University of Montana Law School violates ABA standards

Consultant on Legal Education                                 November 5, 2010

American Bar Association

321 N. Clark St.

Chicago, IL 60654-7598

 

RE: University of Montana Law School, Missoula, MT 59812

 

Abstract:

This report is to inform the legal consultant on Education, the Accreditation Committee, and the Council of the Section of Legal Education of the American Bar Association of violations of standards, and criminal acts by students at the above mentioned law school.

Acknowledgement:

Thanks is given to Beverly Holmes, of the Legal Education Section for providing the standards of review, the format and procedure to lodge this letter in compliance with Rule 24: Law School Non-compliance with the Standards.

Background:

The American Bar Association, based in Chicago, IL grants approval to law schools who comply with their strict law school standards in the United States.  At present, the American Bar Association has sanctioned and approved a law school in Missoula, Montana.  The name of the School is The University of Montana Law School.

 

The University of Montana Law School is the only law school in the state.   The State of Montana is the third largest state in the lower 48 states of the United States.  Montana’s population is currently less than 1 million residents.  The US Department of Justice has ranked Montana as the 48^th state out of 48 for justice in 2007.

Body of Report:

On August 8, 2007 a law student named Angela Wetzsteon (available: www.AngelaWetzsteon.blogspot.com) entered a Ravalli County courtroom in Hamilton, MT approximately 50 miles south of Missoula, Montana.  Without supervision, or Montana Bar License, this law student:

·         Broke speedy trial of the Defendant

·         Broke rules of criminal procedure for the State of Montana with respect to discovery.

·         Knowingly used tampered evidence to convict a Defendant

·         Did not submit required introductory paperwork to court prior to trial

·         Violated Defendants inalienable right to justifiably defend property in Montana

·         By omission, did not speak against false arrest warrant although licensed Defense counsel was in court on behalf of Defendant.

·         Was not supervised, observed or otherwise overseen by a competent, licensed attorney.

·         Violated the Montana Student Practice Act (Order #12982) of the MT Supreme Court.

·         Was in criminal contempt per Montana Code Ann. § 45-7-309, a misdemeanor.

[ Note: it was later determined that US Senator Max Baucus (D-MT), and Deputy Chief of Staff for President Obama named Jim Messina used their power over the legislative, judiciary and executive branches to give US Presidential appointment to Dean Eck and at least $1.7M to protect Wetzsteon via a "donation" to the Montana Law School.]

The students name was obscured intentionally for three years by George Corn the former Ravalli County Attonrey (available: www.GeorgeCorn.com), and first discovery of the actual name was in the third week in April, 2010 as is supported in affidavit attached to this report.[1]  This student is a 2008 graduate of the University of Montana Law School in Missoula, MT.

 

A second student, Audry Schultz a 2009 graduate of the University of Montana Law School wrote on her Linkedin® online professional account that she  “independently prosecuted defendants…” for the Missoula County Attorney Office in Missoula, MT.  Notice of this student practice was given to the current Dean of the law school electronically on July 10, 2010[2].

Violations to the Montana Student Practice Act (Order #12982) by the second student include:

·         Length of clinical instruction not to exceed 12 months.  Student #2, in online professional account indicated 1yr. 1mo. for “Student Prosecutor” in Missoula County.

·         Practice of law without supervisor is unauthorized practice of law in State of Montana.

·         Contempt of Court; Montana Code Ann. MCA §47-7-309.

·         Counsel victims, and negotiating plea agreements are not unsupervised actions as per the Montana Student Practice Act of 1975.

Standards in question for University of Montana Law School

For the American Bar Association to approve a law school, it must meet all of the standards for approval of law schools.  The report which delineates these standards is entitled 2010-2011 ABA Standards for Approval of Law Schools.  The Standards are also available online at: www.abanet.org/legaled/standards/standards.html . 

Specifically, the University of Montana Law school is having difficulty meeting two standards for the American Bar Association.

Standard 101-  program is consistent with sound legal education principles.

Standard 504- involving the character and fitness of law students.

A program which allows law students to commit misdemeanor crimes is not a program with sound legal ed. principals.  To knowingly disobey a court order is criminal contempt in the State of Montana.  To allow practice law unsupervised, and unlicensed as a law student is an unsound legal education principle.

To allow a student to practice law unsupervised for 13 months (student #2 admission) is in violation of the Montana Student Practice Act and also not sound legal education.  The learning element of student practice engrains an attorney for their work life as they function in the courts.  By the University of Montana allowing students to practice law prior to oath, passing of the Bar, and unsupervised in a clinical instruction environment[3] is not sound legal education as would be recognized by the American Bar Association.

The American Bar Association (ABA) Standards for an accredited law school are to develop attorneys who will benefit the court system, and not detract and make the worst situation in the country for justice even worse.  The Association has a high degree of esteem and respect from the American public to voluntarily oversee the professional conduct of attorneys in the United States.  The motto of the ABA is defending liberty and pursuing justice.  A way for the Association to meet their objectives of their motto is to stringently piece through a failing program in Missoula, MT to ensure compliance with ABA standards as prescribed in their standards for legal education.  At the discretion of the ABA, and their respective committees, officers and rules, a site visit to ensure compliance is requested.

Students who are taught that violating law, ethical standards, and constitutional rights of US Citizens prior to Juris Doctorate degree are not fit, or have the right character and temperament to be attorneys.  The ABA standard for law students fitness for legal education is found in ABA standard 504.  The University of Montana has not met this standard for the two students described within this report.  Due to at least two standards being breeched, the University of Montana is ripe for sanctions, review, and potentially temporary closure due to the severity of the enclosed ABA standard violations.

Actions taken by University of Montana Law School

The former Dean of the University of Montana Law School, Ed. Eck met with a member of the public without any problem and student practice was discussed using sworn statements from a Ravalli County Justice.  This meeting was on October 20, 2007 at 1:30pm.  At this time, the University of Montana Law school knew of should have known of its student clinic problems, character and fitness problems of their law students, and other problems that a reasonable Dean of an ABA sanctioned law school would make to repair the issues presented in the aforementioned meeting.  Otherwise, the term for this conduct by the University of Montana Law School is negligence to the American Bar Association standards of legal education.

Student #2 in this report was a year after student #1 at the University of Montana Law School.  In other words, after the activities of student #1 is fully described to then Dean Eck, nothing within the governance of The University of Montana Law School stopped the behavior or criminal activity, character fitness, and unauthorized practice within this ABA approved, and sanctioned Law School.  At least two Standards are in question here, as addressed in the previous section (Standard 101, 504).  A fundamental breakdown of faculty action, or staff ability to circumvent major breeches in the conduct of law students at the University of Montana is seen throughout this report.

 

Implications of current Law Student/Law School activity

The implications to activities at the University of Montana (UM) Law School as currently functioning are quite severe.  A defendant represented by a UM law student may not get full protection under the law, full ethical understanding, or even full legal understanding. 

[Note: the author has opposed UM attorneys as self represented Plaintiff and in one example was not familiar with mediation practices, appellate procedure; had misrepresented situation to court, myself. Moreover, University of Montana grads are not taught to uphold constitutional rights in court, or know any law ethics.] 

A student or UM law graduate who is not fully prepared for court will not represent their clients well, or be able to fully exercise law as a sworn court officer.  An alumni of UM law who was retained [Mathew Stevenson of Missoula MT] see http://wethepeoplemt.blogspot.com/2014/02/mathew-stevenson-missoula-attorney.html  did ask a client to turn themselves in for an action which was not a crime; again a fitness issue (Standard 504).  If the State of Montana ranks last for justice does not matter; it matters here whether a student is prepared, per ABA guidelines to perform professionally in any court environment.  As this report is clearly showing, the UM law program does not meet societal, or ABA standards for legal education.

The current Dean of the UM law school, Irma Russell has a tremendous background in professional responsibility and ethics.  However, Ms. Russel has refused numerous requests for meeting, spanning more than a 15 month period.  There are no current lawsuits pending against the UM by the author.  A UM president legal counsel by name of David Aronofsky did harass and cajole the author after attempting contact with the UM law school, not within the Standards set by the American Bar Association for legal education.  The author did block Mr. Aronofsky twice from email communications with the University of Montana [he "retired"].

In 2009, the author has made professional contact with the vice dean, the clinics director, the Dean, the new UM President office, the UM President legal staff, and has utilized the Jameson Law Library to prepare cases due to no attorney in the region willing to prepare a civil rights case, or tort for damages against the UM student practice in 2007.  This refusal gives good merit to the legal climate within the State of Montana, and the legal preparation by the UM law school of its students.  By quick review of the Standards, UM students and staff at the law school are out of compliance with ABA standards for accredited law schools.

ABA onerous to the non-compliance to the standards at UM

In Febraury, 2011 a new form will be provided to report writers for indicating non-compliance with ABA standards.  It will be entitled:  “Complaint Against an ABA-Approved Law School”.  As a voluntary professional organization, the American Bar Association has the responsibility to accredit law schools.  At the present time, the ABA has accredited the UM law school and its current practices as described herein.  In plain English, the ABA is now responsible for the UM law school and its actions due to accrediting it at some past date.  The ABA has a responsibility to the public, to its approved law schools to hold a minimum standard.  The University of Montana law school is so far below this standard that it is knowingly allowing its student s to commit criminal acts as law students.  After being informed of this transgression of Standard 101, and Standard 504 the students of UM law continue, and continue to violate the accreditation standards for ABA law schools.

The current Dean, Irma Russell is an ABA champion with respect to professional responsibility and ethics.  Yet, a reply email or return call was not accomplished by the UM Dean.  Even one which said: “I am not at liberty to meet with you in regards to student practice or any other Law School policy”.   If Irma Russell is an ABA liaison on the standing committee on ethics, and the standing committee for professional responsibility and cannot accomplish basic communication to the public, nor meet with members of the public of a publically funded law school, is there any standard or decency in law anywhere?

The UM law school in 2010 under Dean Russell has decided to protect student #1 online, using their web capabilities.  An example of this is found at: www.umt.edu/law/students/competition/moot_national.htm.   If an ABA standing committee member and current Dean of UM law will be willing to protect a student who practiced law without a license, and committed a criminal act, is that a school the ABA wishes to use its name as “approved”?  Should I contact the US Department of Justice with respect to these actions by UM law students, staff, and Dean?  A real response from the ABA with respect to a problem I have traced for 20 years in Montana is being requested by this report.  Former Montana Chief Justice Gray asked when law students are lawyers [and suggested that they be exempt from taking the Montana Bar exam] in the dissent in Shapiro before the Montana Supreme Court in 1996 (Shapiro v. Jefferson Co. 278 Mont. 109 (1996) .

It is hoped that the ABA feels that attorneys are prepared in law school, and can practice ethically and appropriately when they have passed a state Bar exam, sworn an oath to respective constitutions, and follow a personal code of ethics that are learned in an approved ABA law school that follows the aforementioned standards.

By all accounts in this report, the University of Montana is not following the ABA standards described in the accreditation standards of your organization.  As the infamous saying says, is the ABA part of the problem, or part of the solution?  A member of your standing committee does not appear to be professionally upstanding with respect to criminal behavior of its law students. Imagine the impact of a false incarceration, or arrest in the 21^st century climate of employment.  If those arose by way of an ABA approved law school, or law student, where does the responsibility rest?  The author does not believe the ABA seeks that liability.

The author of this report requests that the Council, Accreditation Committee, and Consultant on Legal Education consider carefully the aspect of an ABA approved law school condoning criminal acts on the part of its students.  It is happening, and being protected by a standing member of your ethics, and professional responsibility committee, Ms. Irma Russell.

The very core of the ABA is at stake here.  This report is to be retained by your organization for a period of ten (10) years.  The crossroad decision is this: does the ABA cover for a ranking member who is now Dean of UM law school and thereby condone criminal acts within law schools, or uphold the ABA standards regardless of the fallout, political or otherwise.  The author will put blind faith in the ABA, hoping standards will stop this situation at an ABA approved law school.  Surely criminal acts and acts of law students unauthorized to practice will be considered as non-compliance by committee, council, or consultant.  This comprehensive report was written so the ABA may have the tools to take the action that is required by standard, rule, ethics, or law.

I authorize the Consultant on Legal Education to disclose this report and my identity to the law school discussed in the report.  Perhaps when a request for response from their accrediting organization it will trigger a response.  I have had no luck with Dean Russell.

Any misrepresentation of actions, irrelevant facts, or omissions or attempts at defamation on the part of the University of Montana law school in any response will be met with swift, harsh and complete legal complaint by the author.  The actual facts, without bias, in good faith are presented in this report to the ABA.  Misrepresentation has been rampant in the State of Montana’s response to allegations of criminal activity by UM law students.  This includes the Montana Bar, Attorney General, and the UM law school staff and Dean.

The author wishes the American Bar Association success in addressing the non-compliance of accreditation Standards for legal education at the University of Montana.

The author had a national security clearance and was decorated exceptional service prior to the full impact of the student practice in 2007, and has lost a minimum of three years of income, and character defamation.  On November 2, 2010 the supervisor attorney for Angela Wetzsteon (student #1) was removed from office through efforts of the author for 3 years.  He was considered “invincible”.  Legal education standards need to be applied to the University of Montana Law School before any more incidents of unauthorized practice arise.

Thank you for your time, consideration, and hard work at the ABA.  My work with respect to this situation, outside of any courtroom is now complete. [Or so I thought--corrupt bastards]

 

Signed and dated this __5th___ day of November, 2010

 

                                        /s/

________________________________________________

                              Michael E. Spreadbury

PO Box 416

Hamilton MT 59840     

www.AngelaWetzsteon.blogspot.com for bumperstickers asking for the prosecution of Angela Wetzsteon for her criminal act of practicing law August 8, 2007 as a law student.  She continues to prosecute without sworn oath, in the county she practiced solo as a Montana Law student, and does not lawfully exist (Ravalli Co. MT) due to no legitimate county seat in Hamilton, MT.
Ref: Montana Code Annotated MCA 7-2-2103

 

Many thanks for the ESLA (European Law Student Assn) for their support of Angela Wetzsteon's disbarment from law in Montana. http://elsa.org  for more.

 

Dean Eck of Montana law was given a US Presidential apointment to the IRS in 2008 to look the other way for Angela Wetzsteon's criminal acts.  He lives in Missoula MT, and unbelievably has been given emeritus status AND paid board of clinics advisory to the Montana Law school.



RESIGNATION REQUEST FOR CURRENT DEAN:
http://wethepeoplemt.blogspot.com/2013/05/dean-irma-russell.html

Jim Messina, although re-elected US President Obama in 2012 is booted from the administration.  He currently works for gay issues in the United Kingdom (UK), and for Planet Hilary Clinton.

Attachments:

 Appendix A (two affidavits) re: Angela Wetzsteon practiced law without supervision.

Appendix B   July 10, 2010 email Dean Russell: Shultz ’09 as independent “Student Prosecutor”

Appendix C  The Montana Student Practice Act Order #12982; MT Supra April 30, 1975

---

[1]  Appendix A is an Affidavit supporting misrepresentation of UM Law student by Ravalli County, unauthorized practice of law on August 8, 2007.

[2] Appendix B is information on the second law student to practice law unauthorized.

[3] Clinical Instruction is the purpose of the Montana Student Practice Act of 1975 (MT Supra Order #12982).

NIH Fraud

NIH fraud: world embarrassment not enough

 

standing in solidarity with other victims of NIH Fraud:

http://whistleblowing-nih-financial-fraud.org/

This blogpost will visually show all of the emissions stacks in Hamilton, Montana, and the planning and environmental disaster at Rocky Mountain Labs (RML) in Hamilton, Montana by the National Institutes of Health, or NIH.

Sound Emissions Video: Rocky Mountain Labs, September 25, 2011

Beware of the Military Industrial Complex:

these people have no rules, no ethics, and answer to no one....

The Rocky Mountain Labs (RML) facility is willing to stand behind fraudulent sound data. When measuring Low Frequency Noise (LFN) the "A Weighted" measurement purposely filters out up to 14 decibels (db) which is equivalent to doubling the ACTUAL sound. Not only was the sound not measured correctly, but the NIH facility known as Rocky Mountain Labs (RML) turned down their process the day of the sound tests by 10-15 db as supported by emperical data. Better yet, the engineer is licensed out of state, and used his PE license improperly on the report. It is all about NIH in Montana not protecting the public in violation of the NIH goals.

The Sound of Silence at Rocky Mountain Laboratories

 



In a March 15, 2011 Memo from Rocky Mountain Labs Hamilton, the NIH facility was willing to "stand behind" the data. Query from US Representative Rehberg's office resulted in the same sentiment: NIH is more than willing to stand behind fraudulent data. It wouldn't be such a big deal, unless you know that Low Frequency Noise (LFN) is hazardous to humans health.

This Document is putting in writing on DHHS letterhead that the government is willing to stand behind fradulent data, which is knowingly harming the US public in Hamilton, MT. 
 
Dangerous NIH "people"
 http://wethepeoplemt.blogspot.com/2012/05/dangerous-bugs-more-dangerous-nih.html

 

The sound contractor, Sean Connelly of Big Sky Acoustics cannot practice engineering or Acoustics in Montana without a license due to his fradulent and incompetent work at Rocky Mountain labs--where US Government scientists have no respect for the public they serve.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is endangering their employees, and Americans who live in the residential community that surrounds the lab that studies INFECTIOUS AGENTS. The sound criteria from the World Health Organization (WHO) say less than 30dbA is acceptable. NIH says 50-55dbA are OK. This "self imposed limit" allows NIH TWICE the sound level as deemed healthy. Every change in 10 db is a doubling of the sound, approximately. The RML sound contractor was busted by the State of Montana:

RML Contractor Busted by the Montana Board of Business Standards:
--a Nov. 2, 2011 cease and desist letter for practicing engineering without a license

The NIH also decided that Montana residents are expendable: no emergency protection exists on the Federal Property, and nearest Haz Mat response is 50 miles away in high elevation terrain in Montana.
[see NIH Bethesda, MD USA firestation pictured below]

READ THE FEDERAL COMPLAINT AGAINST NIH:
http://wethepeoplemt.blogspot.com/2012/02/rml-nepa-problem.html

MY REQUEST FROM MONTANA's ONLY US REPRESENTATIVE

FOR RML FIRE PROTECTION:

August 21, 2009 Denny Rehberg's "Listening Session" in Hamilton, Montana

The Fire Danger is extremely high in Ravalli County Montana: The first Presidential fire declaration in Year 2000 included Ravalli County Montana (where NIH's Rocky Mountain Labs is located):

David Erickson Photo

Photo of fire season 2010

Helecopter scooping water within few hundred yards of NIH-RML Hamilton MT

no on campus RML fire protection, Haz Mat crew.

[Americans in Montana are expendable]

David Erickson Photo

This May 2010 photograph shows a truck blocking access to fire personnel on US 93 North of Hamilton Montana.

Trees blow onto road and block US 93 as well, as documented in Emergency Room visits; US 93 also on top ten deadliest highway ranking (see white cross on right side photo)

Marcus Daly Memorial Hospital, Hamilton, MT

*************************************************

This is not just an issue of fraudulent data, and NIH standing behind it. This is NIH endangering the neighborhood in Hamilton, Montana with added stress, wakefulness, and loss of enjoyment of property. Low Frequency Noise (LFN) can increase depression up to 30% . Hamilton Montana within Ravalli County is ranked #107/3102 in the USA for Suicide:

New York Times article on Ravalli County Montana Suicides from 2005:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/13/health/13rural.html

This reading should put NIH "scientists" in Jail

71 db C is 3-4 times healthy limit.
"Got Headaches?"

 





The most important aspect is the NIH facility in Hamilton Montana reducing its sound signature on the day of tests February 2, 2011 by 10-15db which means reducing the noise by half the day of the tests. The contractor misrepresented himself with a PE (Professional Engineer) licensure and measured the sound with A scale which does not pick up < 500 Hz. All of the sound emissions, as observed from the contractor's spectrum meter of frequencies February 2, 2011 emitted from RML were below 500 Hz. Low Frequency Noise (LFN) is sound emissions from industrial process below 500 Hz. NIH officials admit the sound is coming from the stacks for scientific fans as seen below.

Here are the series of photos showing the Stacks at Rocky Mountain Labs, Hamilton Montana. Webmaster note: these pictures were taken in my slippers due to being disturbed at my desk by the stacks in the pictures.  If you work inside you need a top secret clearance, if you live outside, all you need is a camera to document the scientific fraud.

NIH fraud includes no sound suppression of noise emissions at Rocky Mountain Labs

[front entry at S. 4th St and visitor center with red roof]

No sound suppression on Integrated Research Facility--hows this for your back yard?

NIH biolevel 4 facility at Rocky Mountain Labs Hamilton Montana USA

Emissions Stacks from NE Cor. of RML facility, no sound suppression

[view over the Administration (grey) Building at RML]

Emissions Stacks and proximity to neighborhood south of RML lab on 4th St.

[These were generating very significant sound emissions at time of photo]

Note: shrubs are private residence, black fence is RML property line

Sound Emissions at S. 5th St. near Montana St. Hamilton MT

Can anyone figure out that sound can only go out to this residential community due to a literal brick wall that bounces all sound waves towards residences from RML?

RML sound stacks on BSL-2 taken from East side of property

noise was very evident at this location

no sound control devices to stop sound intruding into neighborhood.

BSL-4 Stacks beyond tree over visitor center

Moral of the story: Americans are not important. RML will conspire with a fraudulent contractor to defraud the public and produce as much sound as we wish. RMLRML will use tens of millions of gallons of MUNICIPAL water for their cleaning of Bubble Suits and the residents must listen to this RACKET and PAY for this racket from RML, one of 27 NIH facilities in the country.

Letter to top NIH Brass about RML problem:
http://wethepeoplemt.blogspot.com/2013/03/nih-letter-to-top-brass.html

RML photo

NIH RML level IV biosafety suit which must be washed with our municipal water (and flushed out into the Bitterroot River [60 Million Gals./yr]

So do you think NIH is out of control? Do you think Americans who purchased homes should be allowed to sleep at night, or do you think a government lab should be able to commit scientific misconduct in the name of the National Institutes of Health?

WAIT.....IT GETS BETTER!!

No Emergency Protection at the NIH-RML facility

here is the Bethesda facility emergency services (on campus)

flickriver.com

NIH Firestation at Bethesda, MD campus.

WHY NO PROTECTION IN MONTANA---WE'RE EXPENDABLE....

We have learned today that NIH cares for its "MUCKY-MUCKS" like Dr. Anthony Fauci of NIAID. We learn that embezzling municipal water for industrial purposes [RML has 4 industrial wells on the Hamilton site, but would prefer to have the residents pay for their water instead of paying the electric bill to pump it out of their own wells].

Keeping Hamilton, MT residents awake with their process, as North, East, and South are residential as close as 10 feet from fences. Who is the planner for this catastrophe?

flicker.com

Dr. Marshall Bloom MD in bowtie, Dr. Anthony S. Fauci M.D.in tie
 

Bloom planned RML facility expansion for 5 years prior, and now needs more land, cant contain sound, no emergency protection on site. Dumping of 60Million gallons of wastewater in this fly fisherman's river!!

[Medical Doctors are not supposed to do harm--ooopsy!]

********************

flyfishing connection.com
Dr. Marshall Bloom [seated] on the Bitterroot River Hamilton Montana

Mr. Marshall Bloom, Associate Director RML Hamilton, MT

Dr. Marshall Bloom was called at his published residence telephone on September 25, 2011 with the new data. Apparently, medical doctors for NIH ignore new information. "We have already answered you" and hung up. Well, the NIH has not answered to their worldwide fraud in Hamilton Montana, or why they retain directors like Marshall Bloom in Hamilton MT who have been on the NIH tit since 1979. Medical Doctors from NIH are not attuned to listening to new information, they are TOO BIG and TOO IMPORTANT for the general public. Our taxpayers wasted their money on Dr. Bloom. When the man's license plate says "DR TROUT" how interested is he in his job? Dr Trout (Bloom) destroyed the the Bitterroot River where he flyfishes. Bloom is also in denial of the worldwide fraud caused by his inability to plan the NIH-RML facility. Bloom was chair of the planning for the disasterous RML expansion planning in Hamilton MT five years prior to construction, and sits on the Montana Terrorism task force.

Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, Director National Institute Allergic & Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

zeriamerikes.com

(apparently Dr. Fauci and Forbes did not want a picture on this blog, we're honored to continue)

 

Dr. Anthony S. Fauci spoke at the Hamilton MT Performing Arts Center in August 2011.
Here is my blogpost about that talk--I actually was impressed:

 

There is a darker side. Although I identified with Dr. Fauci's intellect and sentiment, his suit, shoes, and demeanor seemed a little lavish even for a director of NIAID since early 80's (the youngest NIAID director).

There is information that Dr. Fauci has researchers strategically placed on boards of Rx companies, or development companies. When $45B is spent on HIV/AIDS research in the world, is Dr. Fauci dipping his ladle into that resource a little too deep? Other speculation is his patents that allow him to profiteer off AIDS research, and not so ethical use of his position as NIAID director. Again, the dots connect...especially when he is proud of his close association with several recent US presidents. I remind Dr. Fauci and the public that even during his AIDS talk in August he was aware of being spared of service in Vietnam by choosing the Public Health Service in the 1960's--the NIH.

Public service means service to the public. NIH has forgotten this in Hamilton, Montana at Rocky Mountain Labs.

pfafire.com

Actual Truck purchased for HVFD by NIH
(and used for parades for people to sit on and wave to the crowds)

The Hamilton Volunteer fire Department did cone "drills" in the parking lot after Dr. Fauci's talk. Lets watch them answer a call for infectious agents at NIH-RML. Or better yet, lets switch NIH Bethesda with HVFD Hamilton MT. The NIH helped secure $250,000 for a aerial ladder truck for HVFD (above) we don't have any buildings above three stories, and it comes out for parades for people to sit on.
Peter Pilkey, retired Seattle Captain explained to President Obama in 2009 that it was the "most useless piece of equipment" the HVFD could have in his letter about NIH-RML and Montana corruption: http://wethepeoplemt.blogspot.com/2013/01/montana-us-president-letter-2009.html
 

*************

Mr. Marshall Bloom MD [his medical license is not active in Montana]

--on Terrorism task force for Montana [lets show you his handiwork]

S. 5th St. Hamilton is a dragstrip prior to entryway protected by chain link fencing:

A speeding truck would have had no problem penetrating Dr. Blooms Administration Building

[worth $31Million]

until they were informed of the security problem and installed barricades.

RML is on the flightpath for final approach to the Ravalli County Airport

[so small planes have no restriction over this Bio level 4 laboratory;

with no on-site emergency safety staff or equipment]

--the county airport is in the bottom right of the map below.

----------------------------------------------------

 

IF NIH AND NIAID had abided by their mission statement, and protected the public, this facility would not be world known.

------------------------------------------------

 

Link to Map of Hamilton, Montana:

http://www.cityofhamilton.net/living/maps/docs/Hamilton_zoning_2012_reduced.pdf

 

 www.landsat.com

Rocky Mountain Labs is located at the southern end of Hamilton, MT at the Bitterroot River

[bottom center of above landsat--available on the internet]

 

Why did PHS Officers ignore public health in Hamilton, MT AND dumpedhundreds of cubic yards of fill material (dirt) in a floodplain on the NIH property at RML?

(I watched this happen; and a PHS officer had to "go" immediately when I confronted him at a public meeting on RML construction)

 

The Coordinates of my former residence 200m N. of the facility:

N 42.2406 W -114.1593

 

So in this nice small town nestled in the Rocky Mountains who lived together with its NIH lab for 100 years, it is now taking over the town. Top secret crap, 15 federal law enforcement for 35 acres, embezzle resources and dump waste into Bitterroot River. Make as much noise as necessary to keep infectious agents (Ebola, Flesh Eating Bacteria) cool.

NIH Police outside Jurisdiction

and not protecting their level 4 Bio-Laboratory

[other than a dog that can detect exposives in the back of this Tahoe.]

 

NIH Community Policing Missoula International Airport:

[see video above]

 

This has been a public service announcement: Montana is fair game.

The US government lab will defraud the public instead of accountable to the public.

NIH tells the public: you are expendable; Americans living in Montana.

 

UPDATE:

The US Surgeon General resigned, who protected the Hamilton, MT NIH NIAID facility which is knowingly damaging the public. [June 2013].